A writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as no representative appeared for the petitioner. Any interim order was vacated.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1000648 of 2010 Petitioner :- Suhail Akhtar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Estate Officer And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- P.S.Mehra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present on behalf of the Staterespondents.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 5.1.2024 Mohit Singh/-
Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Suhail Akhtar
State Of U.P.
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
