A writ petition from 1983 was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel stated he had no instructions in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:53387
Court No. - 8
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 5854 of 1983
Petitioner :- Jag Narain Pandey Respondent :- Ayodhya Prasad And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.R.Misra,Ravindra Kr. Sinha,Ravindra Kumar Sinha
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashish Kumar Srivastava,Hari Shanker Tewari,Shashi Bhushan Mishra,Virendra Pratap Yadav
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions in the matter.
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed for want of instructions.
Order Date :- 5.8.2024 Harshita
Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Jag Narain Pandey
Ayodhya Prasad
Others
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
