In this writ petition, the petitioner challenged an order of a Consolidation Officer. The respondent raised an objection regarding the availability of alternative remedy. The High Court held the petition not maintainable and dismissed it.
The writ petition was dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:122016
Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2528 of 2024
Petitioner :- Bilkish @ Balkish Respondent :- State Of Up And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikas Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
Order Date :- 30.7.2024 vinay
Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition is maintainable in view of the availability of alternative remedy.
Bilkish @ Balkish
State Of Up
7 Others
Dinesh Pathak
Vinay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
