Ram Kewal v. D.D.C. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed in default as the petitioner failed to appear in court after counsel expired. Any interim order stands vacated.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed in default; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 162 of 1993
Petitioner :- Ram Kewal Respondent :- D.D.C. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.R.Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
In pursuance to the previous order dated 27.11.2014 passed by this Court, card notices were issued to the petitioner to engage another counsel as the counsel for the petitioner has expired.
Case has been called out in the revised list.
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 14.11.2024 Anurag/-
Digitally signed by :- ANURAG KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ram Kewal
- respondent
D.D.C. And Others
Coram
Anurag Kumar Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/162/1993
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court