The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear after the original counsel expired, and no new counsel engaged.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:74585
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 113 of 1998
Petitioner :- Ram Dularey Pandey Respondent :- D.D.C.Faizabad And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.S.Sahai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A. Mukherji,D.L. Mukherji,R.N.Gupta
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
The counsel for the petitioner had expired, therefore, card notice was issued to the petitioner to engage another counsel.
List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Sri Mohan Singh, the counsel for the respondent is present.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 12.11.2024 Satyam
Digitally signed by :- SATYAM AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Dularey Pandey
D.D.C. Faizabad
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
