This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9622 of 2024
Petitioner :- U.O.I. Thru. The Secy. Deptt. Of Ayush Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare Respondent :- Amar Nath Maurya And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Varun Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Jitendra Singh
Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
(1) Sri S. B. Pandey, learned Senior Advocate/Deputy Solicitor General of India assisted by Sri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Jitendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 are present.
(2) Let a counter affidavit be filed by the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 within three weeks and the petitioners will have one week thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit.
(3) List immediately after expiry of the aforesaid period.
(4) At this stage, the interim relief application filed by the petitioners is rejected . However, the compliance of the judgment shall abide by the outcome of the writ petition.
[Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.]
Order Date :- 22.10.2024 lakshman
Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
U.O.I. Thru. The Secy. Deptt. Of Ayush Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare
Amar Nath Maurya
Other
Attau Rahman Masoodi
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court