The Court dismissed the writ petition holding that once the main proceeding before the Tribunal was terminated by a final order, no jurisdiction survived to consider an amendment application. The Court left open the petitioner's right to seek appropriate remedies for pecuniary benefits arising from a promotion order.
Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:108207-DB
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9396 of 2024
Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Namit Srivastava,Parul Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J.
Order Date :- 4.7.2024 Abhilash
(Donadi Ramesh, J.) (S. D. Singh, J.)
Digitally signed by :- ABHILASH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a tribunal retains jurisdiction to consider an amendment application after the main proceeding has been decided by a final order on merits?
Whether a petitioner left open to seek appropriate remedy for pecuniary benefits arising from a promotion order?
Was the writ petition liable to be dismissed?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pawan Kumar Singh
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
Donadi Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
