Yashveer Singh Tomar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In the absence of the petitioner, the case was adjourned by the Allahabad High Court without any provision for an extension or special reason.
In the absence of the petitioner, the case was adjourned by the Allahabad High Court without any provision for an extension or special reason.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9316 of 2024
Petitioner :- Yashveer Singh Tomar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Utkarsh Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. No request for adjournment or pass over of the case has been made.
However, in the interest of justice case is adjourned today.
List this case in the week commencing 15.07.2024.
(Subhash Vidyarthi, J.)
Order Date :- 2.7.2024 Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Yashveer Singh Tomar
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court