An interim order previously passed was vacated in a writ petition where the petitioner failed to appear, resulting in the dismissal of the plea in default.
The writ petition was dismissed in default for non-appearance of the petitioner. The interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9194 of 2011
Petitioner :- Smt. Sonu Singh And Anr Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education And Anr Counsel for Petitioner :- Diwakar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,D.R. Misra,Rahul Shukla
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
List has been revised.
No one appears for the petitioners.
The Standing Counsel representing the State respondents is present.
The writ petition is dismissed in default.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 18.1.2024 Satyam
Digitally signed by :- SATYAM AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Sonu Singh And Anr
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education And Anr
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
