Shubham Yadav and 7 Others v. State of Up and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as the matter had become infructuous, rendering further proceedings unnecessary at this stage.
The writ petition was dismissed as the matter had become infructuous, rendering further proceedings unnecessary at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:121848
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8921 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shubham Yadav And 7 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Shri Ashok Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
[Subhash Vidyarthi,J.]
Order Date :- 30.7.2024 -Amit K-
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shubham Yadav And 7 Others
State Of Up And 3 Others
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi, J.
Amit K.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court