Highest Court at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, on 01.10.2024, recorded a supplementary affidavit. It granted two weeks to file an affidavit clarifying if discipline could continue post-superannuation and adjourned the case to 23.10.2024. No substantive order passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8914 of 2024
Petitioner :- Chetan Swaroop Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Sugar Industry And Cane Deptt. Lko And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Aprajita Bansal,Anilesh Tewari,Surabhi Rawat Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jaiyesh Bhoosreddy
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of petitioner is taken on record.
Heard leaned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite party no. 1 and Mr. Sudhanshu Chauhan and Mr. Jaiyesh Bhoosreddy, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 whose power filed today is taken on record and are granted two weeks' time to file a short affidavit particularity indicating whether disciplinary proceedings could have continued against petitioner even after his superannuation.
List this case on 23.10.2024, as fresh.
Order Date :- 1.10.2024 Satish
Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether disciplinary proceedings could have continued against the petitioner even after his superannuation.
Whether the supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner is admissible.
Chetan Swaroop Sharma
State Of U.P.
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
