Petitioner sought interest on delayed privilege leave encashment. Court directed respondent to take a final decision within six weeks following a coordinate bench judgment.
Direction to respondent to take a final decision within six weeks on payment of benefits and interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:66355
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8475 of 2024 Petitioner :- Khem Karan Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Its Secy. Min. Of Communication And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Satya Prakash Tiwari
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
Order Date :- 25.9.2024 Subodh/-
Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled to payment of interest at 7% per annum on delayed post-retiral benefits of privilege leave encashment.
Whether respondent is directed to take a final decision on payment of benefits.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ashok Kumar Shukla versus Union of India and othersReferred¶5
Writ A No. 2075 of 2023, _Ashok Kumar Shukla versus Union of India and others_ decided vide judgment and order dated 3rd March, 2023
Khem Karan
Union Of India
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
