Disposed

Kaushlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko and 7 Others

Allahabad HC22 Aug 2024WRIA/6564/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging rejection of regularization as Assistant Teacher. Court grants interim stay pending counter affidavit and orders payment of salary on the post during the pendency.

What did the court decide?

Stay on impugned order dated 06.02.2024 until further orders and direction to respondents to ensure payment of salary to petitioner on the post of Assistant Teacher (Maths).

Kaushlendra Pratap Singh vs State of U.P. Thru… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:57176

¶2

Court No. - 18

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6564 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Kaushlendra Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Pandey,Shashank Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Raj Kr Singh Suryvanshi

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties 1 to 6 and Mr. R.K.S. Suryvanshi, learned counsel for opposite party no.7.

¶7

Issue notice to opposite party no.8, returnable at an early date.

¶8

Petition has been filed challenging order dated 06.02.2024 whereby petitioner's regularization on the post of Assistant Teacher (Maths) in terms of Section 33-G of U.P. Secondary Education (Services Selection Board) Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1982) has been rejected on the ground that Petitioner's initial appointment on 25.08.2000 under Section 18 of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 was not in accordance thereof since no prior approval has been sought from the authorities concerned.

¶9

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the impugned order does not even consider the aspects which were required to be seen in terms of Section 33-G of the Act of 1982 and has delved on an aspect which was not required to be seen in terms of aforesaid provision. He has also adverted to judgment and order dated 07.02.2024 passed in Writ A No.907 of 2024, Rakesh Tripathi versus State of U. P. & Ors. to submit that the criteria required to be seen for regularization has been indicated therein but petitioner's regularization has been rejected on

¶10

criteria which is not coming within the aforesaid scope.

¶11

It is submitted that earlier petitioner had filed Writ A No.10198 of 2023 in which Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.01.2024 has provided interim protection in terms of Section 18 of the Act of 1982. It is submitted that petitioner is also a party in the aforesaid writ petition.

¶12

Prima facie, submissions advanced by learned counsel for petitioner appear to have force and require consideration for which opposite parties are granted four weeks' time to file counter affidavit.

¶13

Connect and list along with WRIT - A No. - 2494 of 2024.

¶14

Until further orders of this Court, operation of impugned order dated 06.02.2024 shall remain stayed and the opposite parties shall ensure payment salary to petitioner on the post of Assistant Teacher (Maths).

¶15

Order Date :- 22.8.2024 kvg/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Kaushlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kaushlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Munna Singh @ Arunendra Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Shyamu vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Raghunath Prasad @ Raghunath and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Deptt. of Basic Education, Lucknow and 2 Others

Michael Paul vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Priyatam @ Pritam Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and 2 Others

Ramchandra vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.