Petitioner challenged counseling assistance despite appearing. Court held separate petition possible and dismissed petition as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; challenge to be taken in separate writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 64 of 2024
Petitioner :- Lachchhi Ram Verma And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Basic Edu. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Sahu,Sonal Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kumar Ayush,Ran Vijay Singh
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
It has been stated by the counsel for the parties that after the petition was filed, the petitioner was permitted to appear in the counselling session.
The counsel for the petitioner states that the counselling in which the petitioner was permitted to appear was not done in accordance with the relevant rules.
The petitioner may challenge the same in a separate writ petition.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 8.1.2024 IB
Digitally signed by :- ITU BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lachchhi Ram Verma And Another
State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Basic Edu. Lko And 3 Others
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
