Disposed

Rambir Singh and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 6 Others

Allahabad HC25 Jul 2024WRIA/5611/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This interlocutorial order disposed of a writ petition seeking salary fixation and arrears. The court permitted the petitioner to file a fresh representation encloserg prior documents, directing the competent authority to decide within ten weeks via a reasoned order rather than adjudicating merits at the hearing stage.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to file fresh representation; Authority directed to decide within ten weeks via reasoned order.

Rambir Singh and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:50260

¶2

Court No. - 4

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5611 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rambir Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rankaj Kumar Vishwakarma,Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Vinod Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jogendra Nath Verma, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite parties.

¶6

By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed following relief :

¶7

"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No. 3 & 4 to carry out the fixation of salary of petitioner in terms of government order dated 26.08.1977 and G. O. dated 18.05.1983 contained ANNEXURE No.3 & 4 to this writ petition.

¶8

(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay arrear of difference of salary after fixation along with appropriate interest."

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that ends of justice would suffice if he is allowed to move a fresh representation before the competent authority and the same may be directed to dispose it of with speaking and reasoned order within stipulated time.

¶10

With the consent of parties the writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage.

¶11

Without entering into the merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within 10 days before the opposite party no. 4 / competent authority enclosing his earlier representations along with all relevant documents. If such a representation is moved the competent authority concerned is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, say within a period of ten weeks from the date of production of the certified copy of this order.

¶12

The competent authority shall communicate the decision on the representation to the petitioner forthwith.

¶13

Writ petition is finally disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 25.7.2024/Om

¶15

Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rambir Singh and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rambir Singh and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Badelal Tiwari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Smt. Nigar Fatima Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Food Safety and Drug Administration, Lko. and 3 Others

Juber Ahmad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin./ Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Panchayat Raj Lko. and 3 Others

Ravi Tyagi vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Transport Lko and 3 Others

Pradeep Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Homeguards Deptt. Lko. and Others

Jai Pal Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Cooperative Lko. and 3 Others