Disposed

Prabhnjanam v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC18 Jul 2024WRIA/5295/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the District Inspector of Schools to decide on the petitioner's dismissal within six weeks. Pending that decision, the court ordered the school management to treat the petitioner as in regular service under U.P. Intermediate Education Act Regulations.

What did the court decide?

Direction to School Management to treat petitioner in regular service pending final decision by District Inspector of Schools.

Prabhnjanam vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:48318

¶2

Court No. - 18

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5295 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Prabhnjanam

¶5

Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ghanshyam Verma,Siyaram Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajay Pratap Singh

¶6

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties 1 to 3 and Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.4. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite parties 5 and 6 stand dispensed with.

¶8

Petition has been filed challenging orders dated 02.07.2024 passed by the Committee of Management dismissing petitioner from service of the College concerned on a Class III post. Also under challenge is order dated 04.07.2024 deleting name of petitioner from attendance register as well as resolution of the committee of Management dated 30.06.2024 pertaining to dismissal of petitioner's services.

¶9

Learned counsel for opposite parties at the very outset has submitted that papers with regard to dismissal of petitioner's services have already been forwarded to District Inspector of Schools where they are pending consideration.

¶10

In view of aforesaid, opposite party no.2 i.e. District Inspector of Schools, Sultanpur is directed to take a final decision with regard to aforesaid issue expeditiously within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of recommendations made by the Committee of Management.

¶11

Since final decision is yet to be taken by the competent authority i.e. District Inspector of Schools, the Management of the School concerned is directed to treat petitioner in regular service in terms of Regulation 31 of the Regulations framed under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921,

¶12

till final decision of the District Inspector of Schools.

¶13

With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 18.7.2024 kvg/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Prabhnjanam v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhnjanam v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Girvar Singh Katiyar Vs the Commitatee of Management Vivekanand Inter College

Baleel Khan Vs State of U.P.through Secy.

Janak Dulari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education and 2 Others

Prabhnjanam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. and 5 Others

Vinod Bajpai Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Cooperative Lko. and Another

Achche Lal Vs Secretary, Jalkar Vibhag, Nagar Nigam Lko. and 3 Others