Writ petition against inquiry proceedings instituted against the petitioner was dismissed as infructuous, no one appearing to press it; the court held the cause of action had not survived as the inquiry must have been completed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:2849
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4163 of 2011
Petitioner :- Laxmi Narain Agarwal Respondent :- The U.P.Cooperative Institutional Service Board Lucknow Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Bose Counsel for Respondent :- Sudeep Seth,Anil Kumar Sharma,Brijesh Yadav,Dilip Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents is present.
The Court has perused the record. The petition has been filed against the inquiry proceedings instituted against the petitioner. It appears that petition has become infructuous and cause of action does not survive as the inquiry instituted against the petitioner must have been completed.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 10.1.2024 Ashutosh
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Laxmi Narain Agarwal
The U.P. Cooperative Institutional Service Board Lucknow
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
