Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner when the case was called; any interim order stood vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:2195
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3805 of 2003
Petitioner :- Ramanand Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Its Prin. Secy. Medical Education Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Verma,N.N. Jaiswal,Umajeet Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
List has been revised.
Case called out.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. Learned State Counsel is present.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution .
Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
Order Date :- 9.1.2024 Arnima
Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ramanand Singh
State Of U.P. Through Its Prin. Secy. Medical Education
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
