The single-judge bench dismissed the 20-year-old writ petition as infructuous because the petitioners, served notice in 2024, failed to respond. The court allowed an application for recall within eight weeks if cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:4622
Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3715 of 2003 Petitioner :- Paritosh Kumar And Ors. Respondent :- Dir. General Medical And Health U.P. Swasth Bhawan Lko.And Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Mathur Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
OfÏce report dated 16.01.2024 indicates that card notice has been served on both the petitioners but none has responded and no vakalatnama has been filed.
Learned Standing Counsel for the State is present.
it is an old matter of 2003. It appears that by efÒux of time, the petitioners have lost interested in the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
It is open for the petitioners to move an application for recall within eight weeks in case cause survives.
Order Date :- 17.1.2024 Pks
Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Paritosh Kumar And Ors.
Dir. General Medical And Health
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
