State challenged a Tribunal order granting a third ACP to an employee, contending two promotions and one financial upgradation/time scale had already been granted, making a third ACP inadmissible. Court issued notice to the opposite party returnable at an early date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3706 of 2024
Petitioner :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko. And Another Respondent :- Sahadev Pal Counsel for Petitioner :- C.S.C. Counsel for Respondent :- Birendra Kumar Yadav,Manoj Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
(Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 13.5.2024 R.K.P.
Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal erred in granting a third ACP despite two promotions and one financial upgradation/time scale already having been granted.
State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko.
Sahadev Pal
Rajan Roy
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
