Disposed

Ramsajivan v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC10 May 2024WRIA/3642/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petitioner sought directions to grant minimum pay scale under the 7th Pay Commission with arrears from March 2018. The court directed the Divisional Forest Officer to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.03.2024 and issue a decision within two months.

What did the court decide?

Directions to the Divisional Forest Officer to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 30.03.2024 in accordance with law within two months.

Ramsajivan vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Court No. - 6

¶2

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3642 of 2024

¶3

Petitioner :- Ramsajivan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Tushar Bhushan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

¶6

Present writ petition has been filed for issuing a direction to the respondent no. 2- The Divisional Forest Officer, Van Evam Jal Vayu Parivartan Prabhag, Raebareli to forthwith grant the minimum of the payscale of Rs. 18,000/- as per 7th Pay Commission alongwith arrears since March, 2018 in terms of the judgment and order dated 17.11.2018 passed by this Court in Writ A No. 11964 of 2018 (Mohan Swaroop and Another Vs. State of U.P. and others).

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Class-IV post in July, 1998 and he has continuously been functioning on the said post. After coming of 7th Pay Commission, the petitioner has made representation dated 30.03.2024 before respondent no. 2 for grant of minimum of pay scale of Rs. 18000/as per 7th Pay Commission but no decision has been taken by the respondent no. 2 and the matter is still pending.

¶8

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer to the extent that respondent no. 2 may be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner mentioned hereinabove within the time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 30.03.2024 in accordance with law and keeping in view the judgment and order dated 17.11.2018 passed by this Court in the case of Mohan Swaroop (supra) within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶11

Order Date :- 10.5.2024 Pachhere/-

¶12

Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ramsajivan v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramsajivan v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sukh Das and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Horticulture Lko. and Others

Gajendra Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Smt. Mohini Sindhi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bal Vikas Sewa Avam Pushtahar Vibhag U.P. Lko. and 6 Others

Doodh Nath Shukla Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and Others

Anil Singh @ Anil Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical and Health Services Lko. and 4 Others

Ramsajivan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. and Another