The High Court accepted the petitioner's prayer to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh due to missing documents and pleaded facts.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3237 of 2024
Petitioner :- Munni Devi Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Mishra,Tabassum Bano Counsel for Respondent :- Abhinava Krishna Srivastava,C.S.C.
Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.
Ms. Tabassum Bano, learned Counsel for the petitioner comes up with a prayer that this petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh, inasmuch as certain documents could not be annexed and certain essential facts could not be pleaded.
The prayer is accepted.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
Mr. Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, Advocate is present on behalf of the Nagar Nigam Firozabad.
Order Date :- 27.11.2024 Brijesh Maurya
Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Munni Devi
State Of Up
Nagar Nigam Firozabad
3 Others
J.J. Munir
Brijesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
