Hritwik Srivastava vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lucknow and Others

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:32253

Court No. - 6

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3211 of 2024

Petitioner :- Hritwik Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Srivastava,Atul Kumar Srivastava,Himadri Goswami,Imtishal Shah Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents.

¶7

With the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided.

¶8

Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the appointment of the petitioner on compassionate grounds on a Group-C post.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection.

¶10

In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent No.2 then the respondent No.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation.

¶11

With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of.

¶12

It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.

¶13

Order Date :- 25.4.2024 Pachhere/-

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Hritwik Srivastava v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lucknow and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hritwik Srivastava v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lucknow and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Gupta Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Horticulture Lko. and Others

Sub Inspector (Civil Police) Amol Kumar Sharma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Smt. Sashibala Vs State of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. of Directorate of Geology and Mining, Lko. and Another

Saket Girls Pg College, Dahilamau, Pratapgarh Thru. Manager Kusum Lata Srivastava and Anr. vs Commissioner for Employees Compensation / Assistant Labour Commissioner, Pratapgarh and Another

Jainendra Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Basic Education Lko. and Others

Prem Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Horticulture Lko. and Others