Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as neither petitioner nor counsel appeared when the case was listed for final disposal; State counsel pointed to an earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:46915
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2201 of 2000
Petitioner :- Vikas Kant Srivastava Respondent :- The District Inspector Of School Counsel for Petitioner :- Nishit Upreti Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
List has been revised. Petition has been listed under the heading that it shall not be adjourned. No one has appeared on behalf of petitioner nor any adjournment has been sought. While learned State counsel is present and has drawn attention to earlier order dated 31.03.2014 passed by this Court.
In view thereof, petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution .
Order Date : - 10.7.2024 Subodh/-
Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Vikas Kant Srivastava
The District Inspector Of School
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
