Disposed

Mohit Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Allahabad HC23 Feb 2024WRIA/1391/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction for grant of minimum pay scale. The court, without entering into merits, disposed of the petition by directing the respondent to consider and decide the petitioner's representation within two months in accordance with law and a prior judgment.

What did the court decide?

Direction granted to respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 16.01.2024 within two months.

Mohit Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:16348

¶2

Court No. - 18

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1391 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Mohit Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Tushar Bhushan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.

¶7

Present writ petition has been filed for issuing a direction to the respondent no. 2-Divisional Forest Officer, Dakshin Kheri Van Prabhag, Lakhimpur Kheri to forthwith grant the minimum of the pay-scale of Rs. 18,000/- as per 7th Pay Commission alongwith arrears since March, 2018 in terms of the judgment and order dated 17.11.2018 passed by this Court in Writ A No. 11964 of 2018 (Mohan Swaroop and Another Vs. State of U.P. and others).

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Class-IV post in August 2016 and he has continuously been functioning on the said post. After coming of 7th Pay Commission, the petitioner has made representation dated 16.01.2024 before respondent no. 2 for grant of minimum of pay scale of Rs. 18000/- as per 7th Pay Commission but no decision has been taken by the respondent no. 2 and the matter is still pending.

¶9

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer to the extent that respondent no. 2 may be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner mentioned hereinabove within the time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.

¶10

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶11

On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 16.01.2024 in accordance with law and keeping in view the judgment and order dated 17.11.2018 passed by this Court in the case of Mohan Swaroop (supra) within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶12

Order Date :- 23.2.2024 Nitesh

¶13

Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mohit Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohit Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shiv Saran Supervisor and 79 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Irrigation Deptt. and 10 Others

Ravi Prakash Jaiswal Vs State of U.P.through Principal Secy. P.W.D.Lko. and Others

Krishna Kumar Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and Ors.

Amit Kumar Gautam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Vigilance Deptt. Lko. U.P. and 2 Others

Sarojini Thakur Vs State of U.P. through Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko. and Ors.

Mohit Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and Another