A writ petition for judicial review was dismissed as premature. The Court held that while the petitioner cannot seek a direction to stop the authorities from acting, they are entitled to an opportunity of hearing before a final decision on transfer is made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:138914
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12236 of 2024
Petitioner :- Murlidhar Sharma Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
"i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities specifically respondent no. 2, Director of Education, U.P. Prayagraj not to pass any order on the proposal submitted by District Level Authority with regard to proposed transfer of respondent no. 5;"
Order Date :- 29.8.2024 V.S.Singh
Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to stop the Director of Education from considering a transfer proposal without a prior opportunity of hearing?
Murlidhar Sharma
State Of Up
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
