Dinesh Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Irrigation Deptt. U.P. Lko. and 4 Others
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12029 of 2024
Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Irrigation Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 4 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- R.U. Pandey,Amit Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
- Heard Sri R.U. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vikas Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
- Sri Vikas Singh, learned Standing Counsel prays for and is allowed four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within one week thereafter.
- List this case on 27.01.2025 amongst top ten cases.
- It is made clear that in case any payment is made in pursuance to the order dated 16.08.2024, no recovery shall be made till the disposal of the case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dinesh Kumar
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Irrigation Deptt.
Coram
Neeraj Tiwari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIA/12029/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shobhit Yadav @ Mohit Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Mohd. Hasnain Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lucknow
Lateeq Alias Laheek Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and Another
Shadman Khan @ Mohammad Shadman vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another