Mahendra Singh Bundela v. State of Up and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged an order refusing regularization of his ad-hoc teaching services. Court issued notice, granted interim stay on the impugned order, and directed continuation of work and payment.
What did the court decide?
Interim stay on impugned order permitting petitioner to continue work and receive salary.
What the court decided
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10396 of 2024
Petitioner :- Mahendra Singh Bundela Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hritudhwaj Pratap Sahi,Samarath Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
- Heard Sri Samarth Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Manoj Vashistha, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties no.1 to 4 and perused the records.
- By means of the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the validity of an order dated 06.02.2024, passed by the Regional Level Selection Committee headed by the Joint Director of Education, Jhansi Division, Jhansi refusing to regularize the services of the petitioner on a post of Assistant Teacher, LT Grade in Chaudhary Gajendra Singh Inter College, Samhara Kasimpur, District Jalaun.
- The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher on ad-hoc basis by means of an order dated 01.03.1995 and the District Inspector of Schools had granted approval to his appointment by means of an order dated 10.12.1999. The petitioner is working on the aforesaid but he is not being paid his salary.
- The matter requires detailed consideration.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mahendra Singh Bundela
- respondent
State Of Up
Coram
Subhash Vidyarthi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIA/10396/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court