A retiree sought interest on delayed payment of privilege leave encashment. The court directed authorities to decide entitlement per an earlier Ashok Kumar Shukla judgment within six weeks, and pay within six weeks thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:72343
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10152 of 2024
Petitioner :- Sita Ram Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Tele. Ministry Of Comm. New Delhi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Mani Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Dwijendra Mishra
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Order Date :- 25.10.2024 Pachhere/-
Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest at 7% per annum on delayed payment of privilege leave encashment benefits.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ashok Kumar Shukla v. Union of India and othersRelied on
Writ A No. 2075 of 2023, Ashok Kumar Shukla versus Union of India and others
Sita Ram
Union Of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Tele. Ministry Of Comm. New Delhi
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
