Neeraj Kumar Mishra v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 4 Others
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 925 of 2024
Petitioner :- Neeraj Kumar Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Bhooshan, Awnish Kumar,Vaishali
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
- Sri Satya Prakash Mishra, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the opposite party no. 5 by filing his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record.
- The counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 5 wants to bring on record certain documents demonstrating that it was the petitioner who was trying to obstruct the public way. He may do so by filing an affidavit within three weeks.
- Learned Standing Counsel shall also file an affidavit bringing on record as to whether the petitioner has encroached any part of the public land or not.
- The petitioner will have two weeks' time thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Neeraj Kumar Mishra
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Pankaj Bhatia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPIL/925/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. through Its General Manager Vs Hindustan Aeronautics Karmchari Sabha Throu Its G.S.and Ors.
Anuj Gupta @ Mahesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. and 3 Others
Aparna Rajesh Soni vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and Another
Ram Gopal vs State of U.P. Thru Secy. Home Dept. Lko