Partly allowed
Ajay Kumar Yadav @ Ajay v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Revenue, Lucknow and Others
Allahabad HCWPIL/434/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In a PIL regarding alleged illegal encroachment, the High Court noted a factual dispute between the petitioner and the State regarding whether the encroachment was removed or recommenced. Consequently, the court directed the petitioner to institute a proceeding under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 to establish facts.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to petitioner to file an application under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006, to be decided within 90 days.