The court disposed of a writ petition seeking removal of illegal encroachment on government land. It held that since proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code had already been initiated by the revenue authorities for removal of the encroachment, no interference by the Court was required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:31696
Court No. - 19
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 344 of 2024
Petitioner :- Indresh Kumar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue, Civil Sectt. Lko. And 7 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Awanish Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
counsel for the petitioner has submitted that late has been written against the name of Haushila Mishra in description of opposite party no. 7 due to a typographical error.
Order Date :- 23.4.2024 Pradeep/-
Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should interfere in matters of illegal encroachment on government land when statutory proceedings for removal are already initiated?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Indresh Kumar
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue, Civil Sectt. Lko. And 7 Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
