A PIL sought demolition of an alleged encroachment on gata no. 23 and removal of occupants to another plot. The court found the petitioners themselves had no clean hands, with a petitioner occupying part of the land, and dismissed the writ petition as mala fide.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:26705
Court No. - 19
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 291 of 2024
Petitioner :- Kailash And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Kumar Pandey,Paritosh Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
4.वविदप्रान अवतररिक मशुख्य स्रप्राई अधधिविकप्रा नके यप्रावचिकप्रा कप्रा वविरितोधि करितके हिहए कहिप्रा वक ऐसप्रा हिश्री अनधधिककत कब्जप्रा अन्य यप्रावचिकप्राकतप्ा नके भश्री करि रिखप्रा हिहै। र
5.उपरितोक तथ्य सके यहि पतश्रीत हितोतप्रा हिहै वक यहि यप्रावचिकप्रा तरप्रा-कधरत रूप सके जनवहित मम इस उदकेश्य सके पस्तशुत ककी हिहै वक सप्राविरजवनक भभूवम परि यप्राचिश्रीगण अपनके अनधधिककत कब्जके कतो जनवहित कके नप्राम परि बचिप्रा सकके , जतो वक वविधधि मम अनशुमन्य नहिहीं हिहै।
Order Date :- 1.4.2024 Himanshu
Digitally signed by :- HIMANSHU SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a PIL could be entertained to seek demolition of alleged unauthorised occupation of gata no. 23 when petitioner no. 3 was himself allegedly in unauthorised possession of part of the same land.
Kailash And 3 Others
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko.
And 4 Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
