Anshika Singh v. State of Up and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Judge ordered adjournment due to absence of lawyers. Case listed for 22.8.2024. No substantive decision recorded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 287 of 2024
Applicant :- Anshika Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mukul Kumar Mishra,Umakant Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
- The lawyers are abstaining from work today.
- List this case on 22.8.2024.
Order Date :- 10.7.2024 safi
Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Anshika Singh
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- TACR/287/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court