Transfer application filed to move matrimonial proceedings from Family Court, Fatehpur to Kanpur Nagar citing inconvenience. Court found a prima facie case for indulgence, issued notice to the opposite party, and stayed further proceedings until the next date of listing.
Notice issued; further proceedings stayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 551 of 2024
Applicant :- Shreya Gupta Opposite Party :- Abhishek Gupta Counsel for Applicant :- Mehul Khare,Pragya Pandey
Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
Order Date :- 18.10.2024 Sazia
Digitally signed by :- SAZIA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether transfer of the matrimonial case is justified due to applicant's inconvenience?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rajni Kumari v. Raghvinder Sahay alias BabuReferred¶8
(2011) 11 SCC 176 · Who else cites this
Anjali Ashok Sadhwani v. Ashok Kishinchand SadhwaniReferred¶8
AIR 2009 SC 1374 · Who else cites this
Fatema v. Jafri Syed Husain (Parvez)Referred¶8
AIR 2009 SC 1773 · Who else cites this
Mona Aresh Goel vs. Aresh Satya GoelReferred¶8
(2000) 9 SCC 255 · Who else cites this
Sumita Singh vs. Kumar Sanjay and anotherReferred¶8
(2001) 10 SCC 41 · Who else cites this
Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap vs. Shridhar Vishwanath JagtapReferred¶8
(2016) 14 SCC 356 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shreya Gupta
Abhishek Gupta
Kshitij Shailendra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
