Revised dismissed for want of prosecution as the revisionist failed to appear. Interim order vacated.
Revision dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5 Case :- S.C.C. REVISION No. - 154 of 2016 Revisionist :- Rajeev Kumar Aggarwal And Anr. Opposite Party :- Sharad Saxena Counsel for Revisionist :- Sheikh Wali Uz Zaman Counsel for Opposite Party :- Shishir Chandra,V.P. Singh
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
List revised.
None appears on behalf of the revisionist to press the revision. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 21.3.2024 J.K. Dinkar
Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Rajeev Kumar Aggarwal And Anr.
Sharad Saxena
Abdul Moin
Jeshu Kumar Dinkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
