The second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant was absent without pressing the appeal or seeking an adjournment.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:9422
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 395 of 2014
Appellant :- Smt. Vimla Devi Respondent :- Indrabhan And Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Mohd. Haneef,Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- M.E.Khan
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
None is present on behalf of the appellant even in the revised list to press the appeal. There is no request of pass over or adjournment of the case.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This order has been passed in presence of Sri Shashikant Mishra holding brief of Sri M.E Khan learned counsel for the respondent no.1.
(Rajnish Kumar,J.)
Order Date :- 1.2.2024 Harshita
Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Vimla Devi
Indrabhan And Ors.
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
