In second appeal no. 350 of 1988 arising out of the Court No. - 6, the High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as the appellants did not appear nor request an adjournment.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:50155
Court No. - 6
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 350 of 1988
Appellant :- Moti Lal And Other Respondent :- Om Prakash Counsel for Appellant :- B.K.Saxena,K.K.Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- Raj Kumar Dewari
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 24.7.2024 Raj
Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Moti Lal And Other
Om Prakash
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
