Second appeal dismissed for want of instructions as the appellant remained non-responsive to repeated efforts by counsel.
Second appeal dismissed for want of instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:79857
Court No. - 17
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 310 of 2005
Appellant :- Tribhuwan Nath Sanda Respondent :- Smt. Usha Verma And 4 Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Mohd. Arif Khan,D.C. Mukherjee,Mohiuddin Khan Counsel for Respondent :- Shiv P. Shukla,Brijesh Kumar Saxena,Brijeshwar Nath,Jaspreet Singh,S.P.Shukla
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that despite repeated efforts, the appellant is not responding. As such, the present second appeal may be dismissed for want of instructions.
As prayed, the present second appeal is dismissed for want of instructions.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
Order Date :- 2.12.2024 Gurpreet Singh
Digitally signed by :- GURPREET SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Tribhuwan Nath Sanda
Smt. Usha Verma
Manish Kumar
Gurpreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
