Abdul Rahman v. Amin Ahmad
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 265 of 1991…
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 265 of 1991…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 29
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 265 of 1991
Appellant :- Abdul Rahman Respondent :- Amin Ahmad Counsel for Appellant :- T.N.Khan,Mohd. Saeed Ii Counsel for Respondent :- Jitendra Prakash
Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
List has been revised.
As per office report service of notice upon respondent is sufficient.
No one appeared on behalf of either of the parties.
The present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 13.2.2024 A.Kr*
Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Abdul Rahman
Amin Ahmad
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court