Hafiz Abdul Rehman and Anr. v. Jitendra Kumar Sachdeo and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal of 1991 dismissed for want of prosecution as appellants did not appear; respondents' counsel present.
Second appeal of 1991 dismissed for want of prosecution as appellants did not appear; respondents' counsel present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:36490
Court No. - 21
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 255 of 1991
Appellant :- Hafiz Abdul Rehman And Anr Respondent :- Jitendra Kumar Sachdeo And Anr Counsel for Appellant :- S. Mirza,Humayun Mirza,Shaifq Mirza Counsel for Respondent :- Awadhesh Kumar,Anuj Dayal,F.A. Usmani
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
The appeal is of the year, 1991.
None appears for the appellants.
Sri Awadhesh Kumar and Sri Anuj Dayal learned counsel for the respondents are present.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 13.5.2024 Harshita
Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Hafiz Abdul Rehman
Anr
Jitendra Kumar Sachdeo
Anr
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court