In a second appeal filed in 2014, the court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution due to the absence of the appellant. No arguments were pressed.
Dismissal of Second Appeal No. 224 of 2014 for want of prosecution; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:23164
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 224 of 2014
Appellant :- Vindeshwari Devi Alias Vindhya Devi And Ors. Respondent :- Umakant And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Purusottam Awasthi Counsel for Respondent :- Adnan Ahmad,Ashok Kumar Verma
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List is being revised. None is present on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal. There is no request of pass over or adjournment of the case. The appeal is of the year 2014.
The Second Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The order has been passed in presence of Shri Adnan Ahmad, learned counsel for the respondents.
. ...................................... .(Rajnish Kumar,J.)
Order Date :- 15.3.2024
Banswar
Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Vindeshwari Devi Alias Vindhya Devi And Ors.
Umakant And Another
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
