Dismissed
Mohd. Naeem v. Shiv Kumar Nigam
Allahabad HCSAPL/191/2000
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:747 Court No. - 4 Case :-…
What the court decided
AI extract
No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:747 Court No. - 4 Case :-…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:747
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 191 of 2000
Appellant :- Mohd. Naeem Respondent :- Shiv Kumar Nigam Counsel for Appellant :- Virendra Misra
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Sri Suyash Mishra holding brief of Sri Virendra Misra learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no instruction in the matter to appear and argue.
As per office report, notice on the sole respondent could not be served because he has died. No application for substitution has also been moved.
In view of the above, this appeal has abated.
Dismissed accordingly.
(Rajnish Kumar,J.)
Order Date :- 4.1.2024 Harshita
Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mohd. Naeem
Shiv Kumar Nigam
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court