Rajnikant Tripathi v. Bhriguraj and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim procedural order only. Vakalatnama and counter affidavit on maintainability of the second appeal taken on record; matter listed after ten days as fresh for rejoinder affidavit/reply. Decides nothing of general application.
What the court decided
Court No. - 6
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 155 of 2024
Appellant :- Rajnikant Tripathi Respondent :- Bhriguraj And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Dev Mani Mishra,Virendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Rohit Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Vakalatnama filed by Shri Azad Ahmad Khan and Ms. Pooja Singh, Advocates on behalf of opposite party no.6 is taken on record.
The opposite party no.6 files counter affidavit on the maintainability of the appeal which is taken on record.
As prayed by learned counsel for the appellant, list after ten days as fresh to enable him to go through the same and file rejoinder affidavit/ reply, if any.
.................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 27.8.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajnikant Tripathi
- respondent
Bhriguraj
- respondent
Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/155/2024
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court