Pushpa Maurya v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 85 of 2024
Applicant :- Pushpa Maurya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Durgendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Jaskaran Lal Maurya
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
Heard Sri Durgendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Virendra Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Jaskaran Lal Maurya, Advocate who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party No. 2, which is taken on record.
Let objection/ counter affidavit be filed within a period of two weeks.
List this case in the week commencing 18.11.2024 as fresh.
(Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.)
Order Date :- 21.10.2024 (Manoj K.)
Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pushpa Maurya
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- NABAIL/85/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Yash Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt, Civil Secrt. Lko.
Shahnawaz Ahmad Vs Gov. of India Thru. Assistant Dir. Directorate of Enforcement Allahabad Sub Zonal Office Allahabad
Dinesh Kumar Srivastava Vs Govt. of India Thru. Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement
Jitendra Kumar Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.