The High Court rejected an application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS because the applicant's counsel withdrew the petition after facing queries regarding custodial interrogation.
Application rejected as not pressed following the applicant's withdrawal of the prayer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:73672
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 131 of 2024
Applicant :- Sajnu Shah Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Rehan Ahmad Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
Heard Shri Rehan Ahmad Siddiqui, learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party.
On being confronted on the issue of requirement of custodial interrogation, the learned Counsel for the applicant, after arguing at length, prays that he does not want to press the instant application and prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant application.
The prayer sought has not been opposed by the side-opposite.
In view of the above, the instant application is rejected as not pressed.
Order Date :- 8.11.2024 Mohit Singh/-
Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sajnu Shah
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
