Dismissed

Reyansh Rajvanshi Thru. His Mother Sneh Lata Verma and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 2 Others

Allahabad HC13 Nov 2024HABC/334/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Habeas Corpus petition sought release and visitation rights for a juvenile detained by her father. Court dismissed the petition citing separate residences, conflicting custody evidence, and pending suit under Hindu Marriage Act, allowing remedy under Guardians and Wards Act.

What did the court decide?

None granted; liberty to avail remedy under law seeking custody of minor including Guardians and Wards Act.

Reyansh Rajvanshi Thru. His Mother Sneh… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:74756

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 334 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Reyansh Rajvanshi Thru. His Mother Sneh Lata Verma And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailender Singh,Ankit Tiwari,Neelam Singh,Varun Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶6

Heard.

¶7

The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:-

¶8

"i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing the opposite parties to produce the petitioner- detenue before this Hon'ble Court and release her from the unsafe detention of the opposite parties and not to harass the petitioner- detenue unnecessarily.

¶9

ii. issue a writ, order or direction directing the opposite parties to permit Petitioner No. 2 to meet the Petitioner No. 1 as the petitioner shall be granted visitation rights."

¶10

This Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition, for the main relief sought, quoted above, for the following reasons:-

¶11

(i) Petitioner no.2 mother of petitioner no.1 is living separately since 2020.

¶12

(ii) According to the petitioner the opposite party no.3/Manoj Kumar Rajvanshi (husband of petitioner no.2) forcefully took the custody of detenue on 23.06.2024 and to establish this fact the reliance has been placed upon the deed of compromise dated 30.06.2024 annexed as Annexure No. 2, which indicates otherwise.

¶13

(iii) The petitioner no.2 has already filed a suit under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

¶14

For the reasons aforesaid, the present petition is dismissed with liberty to avail remedy as available to her/petitioner no.2 under law seeking custody of minor including instituting proceedings under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.

¶15

Order Date :- 13.11.2024

¶16

Jyoti/-

¶17

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Reyansh Rajvanshi Thru. His Mother Sneh Lata Verma and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reyansh Rajvanshi Thru. His Mother Sneh Lata Verma and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohd. Sadique Alam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy (Home), Govt. of U.P. Civil Secy. Lko. and Another

Dhappal @ Chhotu and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Altaf Ahmad and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Kanhiya Kumar Kushwaha Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Anuj Kumar Pal vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Soniya Kumari Thru. Her Mother Mrs. Usha Devi vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others