In a habeas corpus petition, the High Court found that considering the time gap since filing in 2019, the petitioner had either availed relief or lost interest, leading to an order of non-entertainment and dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:4769
Court No. - 16
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 31501 of 2019
Petitioner :- Smt. Kulsum Throu.Mohd. Harun Respondent :- State Of U.P.Throu.Secy.Department Of Home Lucknow And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
"a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus commanding and directing the opposite party No.4 to release the detenue forthwith and set her free at her liberty.
b) Issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party No.2 and 3 to provide the security to petitioner.
c)...
d)...."
Order Date :- 17.1.2024 Piyush/-
Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Kulsum Throu.Mohd. Harun
State Of U.P.Throu.Secy.Department Of Home Lucknow And Ors.
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
