The court dismissed the first appeal because the appellant's counsel failed to effect service of notice upon respondent No.3, as reported on 08.11.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:74332-DB
Court No. - 10
Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 123 of 2014
Appellant :- Smt. Sadhna Tiwari Respondent :- The Principal Judge Family Court Faizabad And Ors.
Counsel for Appellant :- Ashutosh Srivastava,Mohd.Amjad Khan
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
This appeal is listed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952.
As per the office report dated 08.11.2024 learned Counsel for the appellant has failed to take steps for service of notice upon the respondent No.3.
In view of the above, the present appeal is hereby dismissed .
[Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Vivek Chaudhary, J.]
Order Date :- 11.11.2024 Piyush/-
Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Sadhna Tiwari
The Principal Judge Family Court Faizabad And Ors
Vivek Chaudhary
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
