Dismissed¶4
Allied Examsbanthar Pargana Harha v. Ramu S/O Bali Ram and Ors.
Allahabad HCFAFOD/61/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
FAFO Defective No. 61 of 2011, Allied Examsbanthar Pargana Harha (appellant; counsel Dinesh Kumar Mishra, Ratna Gupta) v. Ramu S/O Bali Ram and others (respondents; counsel Ashok Kumar Verma), High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 4, decided 2.12.2024 by Rajnish Kumar, J. Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of appellant's counsel; interim order, if any, vacated. No statutory provisions, precedents, framed issues, or monetary amounts appear in the order; the underlying dispute was not examined.
What did the court decide?
Since none appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal, the Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution and vacated the interim order, if any. ¶4